Description and Details
London Heathrow Airport is one of the busiest airports in the world and serves as the terminal for many flights as well as the hub for numerous international connecting flights. Due to the heavy volume of the airport and similar size airports in Amsterdam and Paris, there is a worry that Heathrow may decline in use if there are better alternatives. Efforts are being made to keep Heathrow in its dominant position and to continue to simulate UK’s economy by expanding the airport.
The construction of a third runway in London’s Heathrow Airport was brought up to the public in 2009 by the UK government. The goal of the third runway is to ease congestion while increasing the airport’s capacity by 50% and introducing up to 280,000 new flights annually. The third runway would be 2,200 m long via a bridge over the M25 with extensions to Terminals 2 and 5. The plan is strongly supported by several industries, including the aviation industry and trade unions. It is anticipated that the increased capacity by building the third runway will improve flight connections, create more job opportunities and build Heathrow’s resilience to flight delays.
The runway expansion will be built almost completely on community destruction and has caused significant amounts of protest from community members. Hundreds of homes will have to be abandoned, and the current housing market in the area is limited, making it hard to find a place to live. Many community members have been residents for decades, making leaving difficult. Also, a grade‑l listed church and eight grade-ll listed buildings will be demolished. Additionally, the noise of airplanes has been troublesome to thousands of residents in London. From an environmental viewpoint, the expansions may increase CO2 emissions enough for the airport to fail its carbon-neutrality plan by 2050. Officials from the airport supporting the expansion claim the carbon neutrality goals will still be met.
Note that apart from Heathrow’s third runway expansion plan, other suggested alternatives have been proposed, including increasing the use of other regional airports like Manchester. The aviation industry and its aligned businesses are against this alternative as it creates less of a hub in the area. Other alternatives consist of high-speed railways to the new airport in Thames Estuary, but still, airlines prefer securing the hub status of Heathrow.
The plan for Heathrow expansion’s was initially block by the supreme court due to climate change grounds. After more than ten years of tension, the delayed expansion plan got the ban lifted on December 16th, 2022 by the UK Supreme Court. Despite this lifted ban, the expansion is still paused for internal review to ensure environmental concerns and funding is met.
CEE subjects: Construction Engineering and Management, Environmental Policy and Sustainable Infrastructure
Discussion Questions
- Is the expansion of Heathrow Airport a decision for simply economic interest? What will the future of Heathrow be if it’s not expanded?
- How will you classify different types of stakeholders in this debate? Do you have a “compromised plan for everyone”?
- What do you think of the alternative plans? Which one do you prefer and why?
- This is a typical example of environmental protection vs. human development, but the latter is more important eventually and the climate agreement is disobeyed. If this is the case, how can we ensure other climate plans can be successfully implemented?
References
- Peer reviewed articles
- Popular media/news references
- London’s Heathrow Airport’s £14BN 3rd Runway Explained World Infra 3.36K subscribers Subscribe
- Heathrow Airport Reveals Expansion Plans in Anticipation of Third Runway
- Why does Heathrow need to expand?
- What’s The Latest With London Heathrow Airport’s Third Runway?
- The villages living under Heathrow’s death sentence
- Green travel consortium backs airport expansion
Leave A Comment